Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence: Conceptual and Procedural Issues
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article begins with a brief outline of the phenomenon of stimulus equivalence and its relationship to human verbal behavior. Relational Frame Theory is then outlined as a behavior-analytic account of both stimulus equivalence and human language. The experimental procedures that have typically been used to examine stimulus equivalence are then considered, before focusing on a series of studies that have developed two alternative procedures for analyzing equivalence class formation: the respondent-type training procedure and the precursor to the relational evaluation procedure. Relational Frame Theory is used to interpret the results that have arisen from these two methodologies. The article concludes that the empirical and theoretical analyses of stimulus equivalence and derived relations, more generally, will be enhanced considerably through the development of a wide range of experimental preparations.
منابع مشابه
Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Mathematics: Does One Lead to the Other?
This study examined relations between children's conceptual understanding of mathematical equivalence and their procedures for solving equivalence problems (e.g., 3 + 4 + 5 = 3 + ). Students in 4th and 5th grades completed assessments of their conceptual and procedural knowledge of equivalence, both before and after a brief lesson. The instruction focused either on the concept of equivalence or...
متن کاملA functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis.
The aim of this study was to explore a behavior-analytic model of analogical reasoning, defined as the discrimination of formal similarity via equivalence-equivalence responding. In Experiment 1, adult humans were trained and tested for the formation of four three-member equivalence relations: A1-B1-C1, A2-B2-C2, A3-B3-C3, and A4-B4-C4. The B and C stimuli were three-letter nonsense syllables, ...
متن کاملThe Freedoms of Guarded Bisimulation
Guarded logics have been shown to be amazingly versatile and tractable logics since their inception by Andréka, van Benthem, Németi in [1]. Features otherwise known from modal logics are lifted to the richer setting of general relational structures. The leading idea in this generalisation is the relativisation of quantifiers to tuples that are guarded by relational atoms. In a sense that can be...
متن کاملSurgery priority at the time of COVID-19 pandemic, a conceptual frame work recommendation
Background: The current pandemic disease, COVID-19, is making fear and affecting the quality of life in 2020. The mentioned disease can spread human to human, especially by asymptomatic carriers. Healthcare providers and surgeons are at the risk of conferring with COVID-19. Surgical history in pandemic situations is rare. Case Presentation: In this regard, the present study designed for sugges...
متن کاملEquivalency and Non-equivalency of Lexical Items in English Translations of Nahj al-balagha
Lexical items play a key role in both language in general and translation in particular. Likewise, equivalence is a controversial concept discussed so widely in translation studies. Some theorists deem it to be fundamental in translation theory and define translation in terms of equivalence. The aim of this study is to identify the problems of lexical gaps in two translations of Nahj al-ba...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006